MLK Jr. Regional Shoreline Wetlands Project

Status Completed County Alameda
Project Type Compensatory mitigation Location 37.73927° N, -122.20778° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 70.58 Last Updated 20 July 2018
Project Abstract No Data

Project Identification

IDType
M96-56 BCDC - Record Number
222230 USACE - File Number

Habitat Plan

ActivityHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Restoration Depressional Wetland Unknown/Unspecified 35.73 Construction completed
Restoration Estuarine Wetland Unknown/Unspecified 34.85 Construction completed

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
MLK Jr. Regional Shoreline Park - north Construction completed 35.73
MLK Jr. Regional Shoreline Park - south Construction completed 34.85

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2009-01-01 Other SFEP Estuary 2100 project
2006-06-01 Project entered Project entered into database
2002-01-01 Report Monitoring Report issued
2001-01-01 Report Monitoring Report issued
1999-01-01 Report Monitoring Report issued
1998-06-10 Groundwork end On-the-ground work completed MLK Jr. Regional Shoreline Park - south
1998-06-10 Groundwork end On-the-ground work completed MLK Jr. Regional Shoreline Park - north
1997-04-24 Permit BCDC record number issued
1996-01-01 Report Restoration Plan issued

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact Renee Ananda Port of Oakland Not applicable/Unknown
Contact Joe DiDonato East Bay Regional Park District Not applicable/Unknown
Contact Jody Zaitlin Port of Oakland Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

ActivityFunderAmount
Restoration Port of Oakland

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
2008-03-27 5.0.1 MLK New Marsh #1 estuarine perennial saline 54
2008-03-27 5.0.1 MLK New Marsh #2 estuarine perennial saline 65
2008-03-27 5.0.1 MLK New Marsh #3 estuarine perennial saline 69

Performance Criteria

StatusDetailsEvaluation Date
Original criteria See additional sheets taken from "Monitoring and Maintenance Plan, Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline Wetlands Project - Oakland, CA" dated March 3, 1999 and submitted by Levine-Fricke. 2006-06-01
Upload files or links
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
Arrowhead Marsh Panorama Other 2003-11-17 Josh Collins, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Clapper Rail Video Clip Other 2003-11-17 Josh Collins, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Five Year Summary Report, Martin Luther King Jr., Regional Shoreline Wetlands Project, Oakland, CA (Dec. 2004) Monitoring Report 2014-08-06 Andree Greenberg, San Francisco Bay Water Board
Monitoring Report 2001 Monitoring Report 2004-09-14 Mike May, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Monitoring Report 2002 Other 2004-09-14 Mike May, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan from ACOE Permit #222230 Plan Or Permit 2005-10-28 Max Delaney, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Photo of MLK Jr Restoration Photo 2003-11-18 Mike May, San Fracisco Estuary Institute
Project Maps from ACOE Permit #222230 Plan Or Permit 2005-10-28 Max Delaney, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Save the Bay - MLK North Map Other 2009-08-07 Alison Fong, San Francisco Estuary Institute

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores