Zanker Farm Restoration Project: Phase I and II

Status Planning County Stanislaus
Project Type Non-mitigation Location 37.63238° N, -120.51341° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 58.30 Last Updated 30 August 2024
Project Abstract Restoration of the Zanker Farm aims to replace a single large, homogeneous, deep, bedrock-bottom pool with a diversity of riffles, pools, gravel bars, side channels, and floodplain habitats to increase salmonid spawning habitat, benefit riparian vegetation, and create a ecologically robust riverine corridor.
Administrative Region California Department of Fish and Wildlife - Hildie Spautz, CDFW

Project Identification

IDType
Q2140407 CDFW - Fisheries Restoration Grant
Q1940405-02 CDFW - Fisheries Restoration Grant

Habitat Plan

Site NamePhaseActivitySubActivitiesHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Zanker Farm Restoration Project: Phase I and II Final design Restoration/Rehabilitation Vegetation Management Riverine Wetland Channel 32.30 Planning in-progress Perennial non-tidal
Zanker Farm Restoration Project: Phase I and II Final design Restoration/Rehabilitation Vegetation Management Riverine Wetland Riparian area 26.00 Completed Perennial non-tidal

Related Habitat Impacts

Impact Project NameHabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
Zanker Farm Restoration Project: Phase I and II Planning/Scoping 58.30

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2023-10-31 Completion Completion of the 100% Design Report
2023-10-31 Project end date Completion of the 100% Design Report
2023-10-31 Report 100% Design Report and 100% Design Planset complete Zanker Farm Restoration Project: Phase I and II
2022-12-01 Report Zanker Phase II Salmonid Habitat Restoration Project 30% Design Report. Grant Agreement Number Q2140407
2022-10-01 Report Zanker Phase II Salmonid Habitat Restoration Project Existing Conditions and Options Analysis Report
2022-04-01 Report Zanker Farm Salmonid Habitat Restoration Project 30% Design Report. Grant Agreement Number Q1940405-01, completed in April 2022
2021-04-01 Report Zanker Farm Salmonid Habitat Restoration Project Existing Conditions Report. Grant Agreement Number Q1940405-01
2021-01-01 Project start date Restoration at Zanker Farm began in 2021 with a grant from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Landowner Allison Boucher Tuolumne River Conservancy Board Officer

Funding

Funding Need: $15,000,000

PhaseActivityFunderAmount
Final design Restoration/Rehabilitation CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife $973,910

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
No Data

Performance Measures

Plan NamePlan GoalPerformance MeasureMeasure ValueStatusEvaluation Date
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of floodplain spawning and rearing habitat (may comprise other habitat types) 34 acres
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of freshwater emergent marsh/wetland, nontidal 13.5 acres
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of grassland 9.1 acres
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
100% Design Plans and Report Plan Or Permit 2023-12-05 Allison Boucher, Tuolumne River Conservancy
Annual Report Other 2023-12-23 Allison Boucher, Tuolumne River Conservancy
Public Outreack Materials Other 2023-12-23 Allison Boucher, Tuolumne River Conservancy
Tuolumne River Conservancy Website Other 2023-12-05 Allison Boucher, Tuolumne River Conservancy

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores