El Capitan Creek Fish Passage Restoration Implementation

Status Permitting County Santa Barbara
Project Type Non-mitigation Location 34.46053° N, -120.02247° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 0.24 Last Updated 16 June 2020
Project Abstract This project will remove a barrier to Southern California steelhead migration on El Capitan Creek by replacing one culvert with a bridge, providing steelhead access to an additional 4.3 miles of high quality habitat within this watershed and increasing flows and debris conveyance.

Project Identification

IDType
P1896057 CDFW - Prop 1 Grant ID

Habitat Plan

ActivitySubActivitiesHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Restoration (unspecified) Wildlife-specific Measures Creek and Lake (SFBJV Only) Creek and riparian zone 0.24 Permitting Riparian

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
NEl Capitan Creek Permitting 0.24

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2022-04-15 Completion Project Close-out Summary Report due to grant agency along with final invoice
2022-03-14 Report Final report of construction progress due to grant agency
2022-02-28 Other Revegetated riparian areas in project site complete. Photos and as-built drawings due to grant agency for review.
2022-02-15 Report Competed long-term management plan, including final monitoring report evaluating project effectiveness with post construction and subsequent post winter photo documentation due to grant agency.
2022-02-14 Report Draft final report of construction progress due to grant agency for review.
2022-01-31 Other Fish passage as-built drawings including photo documentation complete and submitted for grant agency review.
2022-01-14 Groundwork end Fish passage bridge construction completed
2021-08-02 Groundwork end Start groundwork of culvert removal and bridge construction
2021-08-01 Permit Copies of all required permits due to grant agency
2021-05-30 Other Copies of executed Subcontractors due to grant agency

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Agency Staff Jim Engelke California Department of Parks and Recreation Facilities and Development

Funding

Funding Need: $1,364,473

ActivityFunderAmount
Restoration (unspecified) CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,179,473

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
2015-05-06 6.1 315CAP riverine non-confined 66

No files found.

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores