Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration

Status Completed County Solano
Project Type Compensatory mitigation Location 38.12288° N, -121.98598° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 425.0 Last Updated 8 August 2022
Project Abstract The Project is a public-private partnership effort to restore about 425 acres of tidal wetlands in Suisun Marsh. The project is part of both current restoration requirements for the State and Federal Water Projects and an effort to reconnect land to water in the marsh in order to promote habitat for important native fish species.
Project Groups EcoRestore | San Francisco Bay Adaptation
Administrative Region Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh - Rachel Wigginton, SSJDC

Project Identification

IDType
413754 SWRCB - CIWQS Place Number

Habitat Plan

Site NamePhaseActivitySubActivitiesHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Tule Red - Project Boundary Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration (unspecified) Unspecified Palustrine Wetland Unknown/Unspecified 425.0 Construction completed Fully tidal
Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration (Estuarine Wetland-Marsh) None Restoration (unspecified) Estuarine Wetland Marsh 248.1 Completed
Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration (Estuarine Wetland-Open water) None Restoration (unspecified) Estuarine Wetland Open water 54.83 Completed
Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration (Upland-Grassland) None Restoration (unspecified) Upland Grassland 49.99 Completed

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
Tule Red - Project Boundary Construction completed 425.0
Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration (Estuarine Wetland-Marsh) Completed 248.1
Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration (Estuarine Wetland-Open water) Completed 54.83
Tule Red Tidal Habitat Restoration (Upland-Grassland) Completed 49.99

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2019-10-15 Groundwork end Construction completed in 2019, site breached October 15, 2019.

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact Rob Capriola Westervelt Ecological Services Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

PhaseActivityFunderAmount
No Data

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
No Data
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
Year 1 Monitoring Report Monitoring Report 2021-03-14 Ramona Swenson, Environmental Science Associates

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores