Three Creeks Parkway Restoration Project

Status Completed County Contra Costa
Project Type Non-mitigation Location 37.93800° N, -121.70825° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 13.50 Last Updated 21 February 2024
Project Abstract The Three Creeks Parkway Restoration Project widened 4,000 linear feet of the Marsh Creek flood control channel, created a new floodplain along the low flow channel, and planted native riparian and upland vegetation to create a wooded, creek side parkway along what was a denuded, trapezoidal flood control channel.
Project Groups San Francisco Bay Adaptation | SSJDC Prop 1
Administrative Region Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh (Prop 1) - Rachel Wigginton, SSJDC

Project Identification

IDType
19-049 SCC - Project Number (Restoration)
009 SSJDC - Prop 1 Grant ID
1711 SSJDC - Prop 1 Grant ID

Habitat Plan

Site NamePhaseActivitySubActivitiesHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Three Creeks Parkway Restoration Project None Restoration/Rehabilitation Vegetation Management Riverine Wetland Riparian area 13.50 Construction in-progress

Related Habitat Impacts

Impact Project NameHabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
Three Creeks Parkway Restoration Project Construction completed 13.50

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2023-06-03 Other Native vegetation restoration planting complete
2020-12-01 Groundwork end

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact Sarah Puckett American Rivers California Region
Contact Amy Merrill American Rivers Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

Funding Need: $295,210

PhaseActivityFunderAmount
None Restoration/Rehabilitation Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy $1,827,702
None Restoration/Rehabilitation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency $1,376,623
None Restoration/Rehabilitation Unknown/Unspecified Private Funder $1,000,000
None Restoration/Rehabilitation CDWR Urban Streams Restoration Program $744,404
None Restoration/Rehabilitation CNRA California River Parkways Grant Program $496,731
None Restoration/Rehabilitation SCC State Coastal Conservancy $450,000

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
2023-05-18 6.1 Marsh Creek 2023 riverine confined 70
2020-05-14 6.1 Marsh Creek 2020 riverine confined 61

Performance Measures

Plan NamePlan GoalPerformance MeasureMeasure ValueStatusEvaluation Date
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of floodplain spawning and rearing habitat (may comprise other habitat types) 4000 linear feet
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of grassland 5 acres
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of seasonal wetlands (including vernal pools, wet meadows, and managed wetlands) 4 acres
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Ecosystem Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement Increased acres or linear feet of valley foothill riparian 6 acres
Delta Conservancy Proposition 1 Grant Program Water Quality Increased acre-feet of contaminated runoff treated or retained on-site 4250 other
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
100% Civil Construction Designs Plan Or Permit 2020-06-06 Sarah Puckett, American Rivers

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores