Tijuana Estuary Tidal Restoration Program: I & 2
|Project Type||Non-mitigation||Location||32.55223° N, -117.11369° W Map|
|Project Area (Acres)||2,180||Last Updated||9 August 2022|
|Project Abstract||The Tijuana Estuary Tidal Restoration Program’s (TETRP) is a large multi-phased wetland restoration program involving up to 500 acres of restoration. Its primary objective is to restore valuable habitat processes that have been lost and to increase the exchange of water in a tidal cycle.|
|Project Groups||Southern California Wetlands Recovery Project|
|Administrative Region||Southern California Wetland Recovery Project - Katie Nichols, State Coastal Conservancy|
|92-034-01||SCC - Project Number (Restoration)|
|Site Name||Phase||Activity||SubActivities||Habitat||SubHabitat||Acres||Activity Status||Water Regime|
|TETRP 1: Phase 2||None||Restoration (unspecified)||Estuarine Wetland||Emergent Saline to Brackish Marsh||480.0||Completed|
|TETRP I||None||Enhancement||Sediment Management, Vegetation||Estuarine Wetland||Marsh||1,600||Completed||Mixed|
|Tijuana Estuary||Preliminary design||Restoration (unspecified)||Estuarine Wetland||Emergent Saline to Brackish Marsh||100.0||Planning in-progress|
|Habitat||Acres Lost||Type of Loss|
|TETRP 1: Phase 2||Completed||480.0|
|2027-01-01||Groundwork end||Estimated date.||Tijuana Estuary|
|2019-12-04||Phase start||Tijuana Estuary|
|2010-01-11||Project end date|
|Contact||Mayda WInter||Southwest Wetlands Interpretive Association||Not applicable/Unknown|
Funding Need: $200,000
|Preliminary design||Restoration (unspecified)||Unknown/Unspecified||$895,000|
|Visit Date||Version||Site Name||Wetland Type||Index Score|
|2015-10-08||6.1||Tijuana River Estuary AA#4||bar-built estuarine||84|
|2015-10-08||6.1||Tijuana River Estuary AA#3||bar-built estuarine||68|
|2015-10-08||6.1||Tijuana River Estuary AA#1||bar-built estuarine||65|
|2015-10-08||6.1||Tijuana River Estuary AA# 2||bar-built estuarine||71|
|2008-01-31||5.0.1||Model Marsh||estuarine perennial saline||67|
|2008-01-31||5.0.1||Model Marsh||estuarine perennial saline||75|
|2008-01-31||5.0.1||Model Marsh||estuarine perennial saline||64|
|2008-01-31||5.0.1||Oneonta Slough||estuarine perennial saline||59|
|2007-11-28||5.0.1||Tijuana River Estuary-main channel||estuarine perennial saline||69|
|2007-11-28||5.0.1||Tijuana River Estuary-Border Field||estuarine perennial saline||66|
|2005-06-16||3.0||Tijuana South||estuarine perennial saline||90|
|2005-06-16||3.0||Tijuana North||estuarine perennial saline||66|
|Plan Name||Plan Goal||Performance Measure||Measure Value||Status||Evaluation Date|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||1B. Restore wetlands after 24" of SLR||80 acres||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||5A. Protect existing transition zones up to 1,600' from wetland||0 yes||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||5B. Increase transition zones for at least 40% of wetland perimeter||0 yes||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||5C. Increase non-contiguous transition zones up to 1,600' from wetland||0 yes||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||5D. Create adjacent habitat for upstream migraiton of wetlands after 24" of SLR||0 not applicable||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||6A. Restore tidal characteristics (range, extent, & residence time)||0 yes||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||6B. Restore watershed freshwater & sediment flows (volume, frequency, & timing)||0 yes||in-progress/partially achieved|
|2018 Regional Strategy||Goal 1: Restore Coastal Wetlands||6C. Restore or manage sediment inputs for wetland migration after 24" of SLR||0 yes||in-progress/partially achieved|
No files found.
How to Use the Habitat Development Curve
Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.
For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.
The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.
An HDC can be used to address the following questions:
- At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
- Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
- What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
- Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
- Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
- For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
- Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
- Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).
For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.