Eden Ecological Preserve Restoration Project

Status Completed County Alameda
Project Type Compensatory mitigation Location 37.61931° N, -122.12992° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 767.6 Last Updated 5 April 2022
Project Abstract Not provided
Administrative Region San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board - Xavier Fernandez, SFBRWQCB

Project Identification

No Data

Habitat Plan

Site NamePhaseActivitySubActivitiesHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Eden Landing east None Restoration (unspecified) Unspecified Depressional Wetland Unknown/Unspecified 78.76 Construction completed
Eden Landing eastmost None Restoration/Rehabilitation Unspecified Estuarine Wetland Marsh 45.26 Construction completed
Eden Landing mid None Restoration/Rehabilitation Unspecified Estuarine Wetland Marsh 486.4 Construction completed
Eden Landing west None Restoration/Rehabilitation Unspecified Depressional Wetland Unknown/Unspecified 157.2 Construction completed

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data


Eden Landing east Construction completed 78.76
Eden Landing eastmost Construction completed 45.26
Eden Landing mid Construction completed 486.4
Eden Landing west Construction completed 157.2


DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2009-04-30 Update Site status updated
2009-01-01 Other SFEP Estuary 2100 project
2008-01-01 Project end date
2008-01-01 Groundwork end
2006-10-26 Levee breach Breach to North Creek
2006-06-01 Project entered Project entered into database
2006-01-01 Project end date
2000-01-01 Report Restoration Plan issued


Contact Carl Wilcox California Department of Fish and Wildlife Not applicable/Unknown
Contact Dexter Yee East Bay Regional Park District Not applicable/Unknown
Contact John Krause California Department of Fish and Wildlife Bay Delta Region


None Restoration/Rehabilitation City of Fremont
None Restoration/Rehabilitation City of Milpitas
None Restoration/Rehabilitation City of San Jose
None Restoration/Rehabilitation East Bay Regional Park District
None Restoration/Rehabilitation San Luis Obispo County College District

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
2017-06-23 6.1 North Creek Marsh #03 estuarine perennial saline 76
2017-06-23 6.1 North Creek Marsh #07 estuarine perennial saline 72
2017-06-23 6.1 North Creek Marsh #08 estuarine perennial saline 73

No files found.

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores