Lagunitas Creek Floodplain and Riparian Restoration Project
Status | Planning | County | Marin |
---|---|---|---|
Project Type | Non-mitigation | Location | 38.04403° N, -122.74803° W Map |
Project Area (Acres) | 11.06 | Last Updated | 20 May 2021 |
Project Abstract | The purpose of the project is to restore floodplain processes and enhance riparian ecosystem function and habitat for Coho Salmon (Onchorynchus kisutch) and Steelhead Trout (Onchorynchus mykiss), which are listed under the Endangered Species Act as endangered and threatened, respectively, by the National Marine Fisheries Service. | ||
Project Groups | CDFW Prop 1 | ||
Administrative Region | California Department of Fish and Wildlife - Hildie Spautz, CDFW |
Project Identification
ID | Type |
---|---|
P1796024 | CDFW - Prop 1 Grant ID |
Habitat Plan
Site Name | Phase | Activity | SubActivities | Habitat | SubHabitat | Acres | Activity Status | Water Regime |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site 1 | None | Enhancement | Wildlife-specific Measures | Riverine Wetland | Riparian area | 6.89 | Completed | Riparian |
Site 2 | None | Enhancement | Riverine Wetland | Riparian area | 3.67 | Construction planned | Riparian | |
Site 3 | None | Enhancement | Riverine Wetland | Riparian area | 0.50 | Construction planned | Riparian |
Related Habitat Impacts
Habitat | Acres Lost | Type of Loss |
---|---|---|
No Data |
Sites
Name | Status | Acres |
---|---|---|
Site 1 | Completed | 6.89 |
Site 2 | Completed | 3.67 |
Site 3 | Construction planned | 0.50 |
Events
People
Type | Name | Organization | Department |
---|---|---|---|
Contact | Preston Brown | Salmon Protection And Watershed Network | Watershed Conservation |
Agency Staff | Gina Benigno | California Department of Fish and Wildlife | Watershed Restoration Grants Branch |
Funding
Phase | Activity | Funder | Amount |
---|---|---|---|
None | Enhancement | CDFW Prop 1 - Watershed Restoration Grant Program | $935,467 |
None | Enhancement | State Water Resources Control Board | $800,000 |
Related CRAM Assessments
Visit Date | Version | Site Name | Wetland Type | Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022-06-09 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Restoration Tocaloma dry channel AA2 | riverine non-confined | 71 |
2022-06-09 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Restoration Tocaloma perennial channel AA1 | riverine non-confined | 74 |
2019-07-22 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Restoration Tocaloma dry channel AA2 | riverine non-confined | 56 |
2019-07-22 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Restoration Tocaloma perennial channel AA1 | riverine non-confined | 69 |
2018-05-18 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Mainstem Tocaloma AA1 | riverine non-confined | 79 |
2018-05-17 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Mainstem Tocaloma AA2 | riverine non-confined | 76 |
2018-05-17 | 6.1 | Lagunitas Jewell Mainstem AA1 | riverine non-confined | 76 |
Performance Criteria
Status | Details | Evaluation Date |
---|---|---|
Project not underway | Improve water quality conditions in Lagunitas Creek, implementing actions of the Lagunitas Creek sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan | 2020-08-30 |
Project not underway | Protect and enhance habitat, to the extent feasible, for other non-salmonid species such as California freshwater shrimp (Syncaris pacifica), Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis), California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), Pacific lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus) and Western pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata) | 2020-08-30 |
Project not underway | Enhance habitat for the spawning life stage of Coho Salmon | 2020-08-30 |
Project not underway | Enhance winter habitat for the rearing life stage of Coho Salmon | 2020-08-30 |
No files found.
How to Use the Habitat Development Curve
Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.
For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.
The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.
An HDC can be used to address the following questions:
- At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
- Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
- What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
- Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
- Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
- For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
- Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
- Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).
For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.