India Basin Shoreline Park

Status Planning County San Francisco
Project Type Non-mitigation Location 37.73289° N, -122.37538° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 4.80 Last Updated 29 August 2024
Project Abstract Project consists of site remediation (including remediation of soft-bottom intertidal and subtidal habitat, removal of marine debris and deteriorated infrastructure, sediment dredging, and backfill), construction of a new park on the remediated site, and renovation of an adjacent, existing park, including shoreline restoration and habitat creation.
Project Groups San Francisco Bay Adaptation | San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority (Eligible) | San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority (Funded)
Administrative Region San Francisco Bay Joint Venture - Jemma Williams, SFBJV

Project Identification

IDType
RA-010 SFBRA - Project ID

Habitat Plan

Site NamePhaseActivitySubActivitiesHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Phase 1 - 900 Innes Remediation Implementation Enhancement Bay Habitat (SFBJV Only) Tidal flat 2.40 Implementation in-progress Fully tidal
Phase 1 - 900 Innes Remediation Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration/Rehabilitation Bay Habitat (SFBJV Only) Tidal flat 2.40 Construction completed Fully tidal
Phase 2 - 900 Innes Construction Implementation Restoration/Rehabilitation Bay Habitat (SFBJV Only) Tidal flat No Data Construction in-progress
Phase 3 - India Basin Shoreline Park Conceptual design Unknown/Unspecified Bay Habitat (SFBJV Only) Unknown/Unspecified No Data Construction planned Unknown/Unspecified

Related Habitat Impacts

Impact Project NameHabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
Phase 1 - 900 Innes Remediation Completed 4.80
Phase 2 - 900 Innes Construction Construction in-progress No Data
Phase 3 - India Basin Shoreline Park Planning/Scoping No Data

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2026-12-31 Groundwork end Phase 3 - India Basin Shoreline Park
2026-12-31 Groundwork end Phase 2 - 900 Innes Construction
2024-01-01 Groundwork start Phase 3 - India Basin Shoreline Park
2022-08-05 Phase end End of Phase 1 Phase 1 - 900 Innes Remediation
2022-08-05 Groundwork end Phase 1 groundwork end. Phase 1 - 900 Innes Remediation
2022-08-05 Groundwork end Phase 1 - Remediation of 900 Innes
2022-01-01 Groundwork start Phase 2 - 900 Innes Construction
2021-06-17 Groundwork start Environmental remediation groundbreaking (Phase 1 - Remediation of 900 Innes)
2021-06-17 Groundwork start 900 Innes Remediation Ground Breaking to kick off Phase 1 of the India Basin Shoreline Park Renovation Project. Phase 1 - 900 Innes Remediation
2019-05-06 Project entered
2017-07-01 Project start date

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Landowner Charlene Angsuco San Francisco Recreation and Park Department Recreation and Park Department
Landowner Omar Davis San Francisco Recreation and Park Department Capital Projects
Agency Staff Jessica Davenport State Coastal Conservancy San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority
Landowner Toni Moran San Francisco Recreation and Park Department Capital Projects

Funding

Funding Need: $168,100,100

PhaseActivityFunderAmount
Implementation Enhancement State of California $34,294,995
Implementation Enhancement City of San Francisco $25,427,124
Implementation Enhancement Unknown/Unspecified Private Funder $5,442,450
Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration/Rehabilitation SFBRA San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority - Measure AA $4,988,600
Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration/Rehabilitation City of San Francisco $4,164,000
Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration/Rehabilitation State of California $3,160,330
Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration/Rehabilitation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency $1,948,204
Monitoring & Evaluation Restoration/Rehabilitation Accornero and Sons Investments $1,390,000
Implementation Enhancement Unknown/Unspecified $465,000

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
No Data

Performance Measures

Plan NamePlan GoalPerformance MeasureMeasure ValueStatusEvaluation Date
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Community Engagement Benefits economically disadvantaged communities 0 yes measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Community Engagement Has significant youth involvement component 0 no measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Community Engagement Number of unique volunteers expected to participate 0 count measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Community Engagement Number of volunteer hours expected to be contributed 0 count measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Community Engagement Number of youth participants expected to be engaged 0 count measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Flood Protection Miles of levee to be constructed 0 miles measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Public Access Miles of Bay Trail to be constructed 0 miles measure achieved
San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Public Access Number of public access facilities to be constructed 0 count measure achieved
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
Staff Recommendation Other 2019-05-08 Eleanor Bent, San Francisco Bay Joint Venture

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores