Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project

Status In-progress County Orange
Project Type Compensatory mitigation Location 33.60211° N, -117.88268° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 0.28 Last Updated 17 October 2016

Project Identification

IDType
150316SWR2008HC_M229.01 NMFS - Record Number
SPL-2009-00556-DPS USACE - File Number

Habitat Plan

ActivityHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Creation Estuarine Wetland Submerged aquatic vegetation < 0.1 Completed
Creation Unknown/unspecified wetland habitat None < 0.1 Completed

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres LostType of Loss
Estuarine Wetland < 0.1 Lost Permanent

Sites

NameStatusAcres
Mitigation Site 1 Construction in-progress 0.26
Mitigation Site 2 Construction in-progress < 0.1

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2016-07-15 Monitoring end Estimated date
2013-03-14 Project entered Project entered into database
2011-07-15 Groundwork end Actual date
2011-07-15 Groundwork start Actual date
2011-07-15 Monitoring start Actual date

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact Rick Ware Coastal Resources Management Not applicable/Unknown
Contact Mansour Katany Orange County Parks Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

ActivityFunderAmount
No Data

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
No Data

Performance Criteria

StatusDetailsEvaluation Date
Criteria not evaluated yet See plan in Files & Links 1905-07-08

Project Description

Description
The applicant will renovate their existing dock, add a 174 foot bulkhead and dredge 4,000 cubic yards of sediment from their dock.; Mitigation Type: Onsite
Upload files or links
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
12 Month Eelgrass Survey Other 2013-03-14 SFEI, SFEI
12 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf

3 Month Eelgrass Survey Other 2013-03-14 SFEI, SFEI
3 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf

48 Month Eelgrass Survey Monitoring Report 2016-10-17 Adam Obaza, NOAA
48 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf
6 Month Eelgrass Survey Other 2013-03-14 SFEI, SFEI
6 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf

60 Month Eelgrass Survey Monitoring Report 2016-10-17 Adam Obaza, NOAA
60 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf
Final Mitigation Plan Other 2013-03-14 SFEI, SFEI
Final Mitigation Plan.pdf

Mitigation Plan Other 2013-03-14 SFEI, SFEI
Mitigation Plan.pdf

NewportBeachHarborPatrol_36 Month Eelgrass Survey Monitoring Report 2014-08-28 Chris Solek, SCCWRP
Newport_Beach_Harbor_Patrol_36 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf

This report summarizes the results of a three-year (36-month) post-transplant survey of an eelgrass (Zostera marina) mitigation transplant at the Newport Beach Harbor Patrol and Coast Guard Facility in Newport Harbor, California. The survey was conducted

Newport_Beach_Harbor_Patrol_24 Month Eelgrass Survey Monitoring Report 2014-08-28 Chris Solek, SCCWRP
Newport_Beach_Harbor_Patrol_24 Month Eelgrass Survey.pdf

Orange County Parks replaced aging docks adjacent to the Newport Beach Harbor Patrol and Coast Guard Facility in Newport Harbor, California. This survey documents coverage and density of transplanted eelgrass following a period of two years.

Preconstruction Survey Report Other 2013-03-14 SFEI, SFEI
Preconstruction Survey Report.pdf

S Ca Tracker Data Form_v5_Update_USCG_OC_20140822 Other 2014-08-28 Chris Solek, SCCWRP
S Ca Tracker Data Form_v5_Update_USCG_OC_20140822.doc

This is the updated project information form for the eelgrass transplant conducted at Newport Beach Harbor Patrol and Coast Guard Facility. dated 8/22/2014

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores